WenJiaXin

Hi SG_Lion. I believe you may misunderstand my comments. It's quite evident that quite a few of them judge China without any responsibility. As a media platform, OMG plays a role of misleading many netizens to view PRCs. My strategy is to ignore their ignorance rather than retaliation. Retaliation I highlight here is refers to strong China's prosperousness which may changes their mindset of distortion about Chinese people one day. As a result, their conspiracy never come ture. The reason why I dare to say is many Hongkongers has refresh their traditonal view that they used to have PRCs in contempt and nowadays turning it into more respectations with bilateral relation improvements...Please advise me if make any mistake

SG_lion

WenJiaXin 发表于 10-7-2011 04:06
Hi SG_Lion. I believe you may misunderstand my comments. It's quite evident that quite a few of them ...

I made some modifications. Perhaps this may sound more slick.

"Hi SG_Lion, I believe you may have misunderstood my comments. It’s quite evident that the netizens of OMY discriminate Chinese. OMY unfortunately failed to execute its duties as a public media misled many netizens in regards to the image of PRC. Instead of retaliation, I prefer to ignore ignorance. However, with China prospering, this ignorance will be replaced by awe one day. Just like how the Hong Kongers changed their originally skewed perception of China to a more positive one nowadays. With such transformation, it helped to improve ties between the ex colony and their rightful fellowmen in China."

I am not standing on either sides when it comes to disputes of such nature. It profits no one to be embroiled in an argument based on ignorance. That is why being prudent when dealing with insults is always a better choice than to pursue recklessly for justification over some snide remarks online.

WenJiaXin

SG_lion 发表于 10-7-2011 08:15
I made some modifications. Perhaps this may sound more slick.

"Hi SG_Lion, I believe you may have ...

Thanks for your heartfelt amendments which have obviously showcased your profound English background. Frankly, prudential comments is intelligent method to avoid dispute among people in a special circumstance. Nevertheless, Chinese counterparts never compromise with other nations when it refers to the core benefits. Therefore, Chinese netizens are get annonyed with such snide remarks and their common reflection directly reflect patriotism spirit and a country's cohesiveness. I believe you still remember the case which one Chinese netizen unpardonable judgement to your national core benefits. As a result, he was investigated by policemen. Former Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yeo once said young Chinese people become more aggressive compared with old generation with support of ecomomic, military and diplomatic power. More specifically, Old generation more value peaceful lives due largely to suffering Korean War, Culture Revolution, The Vietnam War... while Young generation not. Therefore, FMM suggests USA needs to deploy military power in Asia Pacific in oder to balance the power. Again, I am not sure whether you are heard 80% Chinese young netizens reach a consensus to suggest Beijing should fight with Hanoi. Please pardon me if I judge it subjectively.

SG_lion

WenJiaXin 发表于 10-7-2011 14:34
Thanks for your heartfelt amendments which have obviously showcased your profound English backgrou ...

Thanks for your heartfelt amendments which have obviously showcased your profound English background. Frankly, prudential comments is intelligent method to avoid dispute among people in a special circumstance. Nevertheless, Chinese counterparts never compromise with other nations when it refers to the core benefits. Therefore, Chinese netizens are get annonyed with such snide remarks and their common reflection directly reflect patriotism spirit and a country's cohesiveness. I believe you still remember the case which one Chinese netizen unpardonable judgement to your national core benefits. As a result, he was investigated by policemen. Former Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yeo once said young Chinese people become more aggressive compared with old generation with support of ecomomic, military and diplomatic power. More specifically, Old generation more value peaceful lives due largely to suffering Korean War, Culture Revolution, The Vietnam War... while Young generation not. Therefore, FMM suggests USA needs to deploy military power in Asia Pacific in oder to balance the power. Again, I am not sure whether you are heard 80% Chinese young netizens reach a consensus to suggest Beijing should fight with Hanoi. Please pardon me if I judge it subjectively.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

'prudential' (to be replaced by...) prudent
pru·dent (prdnt) adj. 1. Wise in handling practical matters; exercising good judgment or common sense.
2. Careful in regard to one's own interests; provident.
3. Careful about one's conduct; circumspect.

adv prudently
n prudence
--------------------------------------------------------------------
'a country's cohesiveness' (more suitable to use...) solidarity
sol·i·dar·i·ty (sl-dr-t) n. A union of interests, purposes, or sympathies among members of a group; fellowship of responsibilities and interests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'I believe you still remember the case which one Chinese netizen unpardonable judgement to your national core benefits.' (amendments...)
I believe that you should be able to recall the case whereby one Chinese netizen passed seditious remarks and held your country with contempt.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Former Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yeo once said young Chinese people become more aggressive compared with old generation with support of ecomomic, military and diplomatic power. ' (amendments...)
Former Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew once spoke about the increasing aggression of the younger Chinese as compared to the older generation. This was due to the progression of economic and military power.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'More specifically, Old generation more value peaceful lives due largely to suffering Korean War, Culture Revolution, The Vietnam War... while Young generation not.' (amendments...)
More specifically, the older generation value peace largely due to their insufferable experience with war and revolution while the younger generation had yet to experience the same abomination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Again, I am not sure whether you are heard 80% Chinese young netizens reach a consensus to suggest Beijing should fight with Hanoi. Please pardon me if I judge it subjectively.'
Again, I am unsure if you have heard that 80% of the younger Chinese netizens agreed that Beijing should carry out military measures against Hanoi. Please pardon me if my judgement is biased.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Honestly speaking, I am very flattered. Your progression is superb. Post by post, you get more understandable.

I can recommend a website that will help you.            http://www.thefreedictionary.com/

This is an online dictionary totally in English. If you want to truely improve, you cannot use the 2 languages in tandem. Allow English to course through your thoughts and put away Chinese for the time being. It will help you tremendously if you avoid the usage of Chinese when learning English.

Do you read English books? Contemporary literature or famous timeless classics? Reading will help to build up your vocabulary. Listen to BBC radio and watch movies in English (preferably subtitled in English as well) It will help you to improve your listening comprehension. Force yourself into a corner whereby you see no way to survive if you don't understand English. That was how some Chinese who came to Singapore barely knowing any English eventually survived and aced their exams. I met one young lad from Chongqing during an event hosted by a leading German automotive product manufacturer. Although he had an accent, we didn't have any problems understanding each other.

I have little to add on regarding your views on the political issues. It is absolutely your prerogative as a Chinese (I hope my assumption is correct) to decide if war should break out between China and Vietnam. But as a by-stander, I think it is certainly far from being profitable for anyone to have countries nearby waging war on each other. This thoroughly affects the economic progression and war has its social implications as well. War, by far, has never benefitted anyone.

profoundmemory

看了，有些根本和中国扯不上关系的东西也要骂中国。只能说那群人心里变态

sun814

Notsing 发表于 11-7-2011 01:25
Guys like you are a credit to your nation, they reflect common sense, humility and amicability tha ...

你的评述对我看来是你对中国经济和军士实力的无知，也对历史的无知。这恰恰反应了我们很多国人无法接受中国的崛起或是还活在改革开放前中国。你在这儿所展现是偏激的看法，也连我这新加坡人所无法接受的。从这帖可以看出你是严重偏西方或偏美国的，你就没看到最近面对南沙群岛问题上，美国就无礼指责中国的行为（在我看来中国什么也没做），却无视日本，越南，菲律宾等国连串的举措？在我看来这恰恰是美国对中国拥有航空母舰，长程运输机等先进技术所做出的回应，可感觉你真还活在上世纪七十年代的中国世界里。

oliver_871

如果有空闲你仔细阅读一下OMY上骂中国人的文章，你就会发觉这是一群智力有问题的。骂人是不对的，但是骂人有两种，一种是聪明人骂人，骂人的同时本能的还能兼顾逻辑，因为骂人是聪明人脑袋休假的时候，聪明人休假还要兼顾一下体面，不会自相矛盾丢脸。另一种是笨蛋骂人，骂人是他们脑袋仅有的工作方式，所以不考虑逻辑，或者天生的就缺乏逻辑。当别人指出他们自相矛盾时，他们反驳方式是你是不是新加坡人？如果不是，他们赢了。如果是，那你就是卖国的新加坡人。这是文革常用的辩论逻辑，偏偏文革是这群智力有问题的人最喜欢批判的一个话题，这也是他们智力低下一例。

sun814

Notsing 发表于 11-7-2011 22:28
For starters, if you love china so much, so renounce your Sing citizenship and move to china, put  ...

哈哈你这么崇拜美国，那你为何不成为美国的公民呢？恰恰就是像你这样的中国威胁论助长了世界不怎么“和平”的氛围。真无知和可笑呀，中国什么时候说过要侵占南沙群岛和南韩呢？之前你提到越南，难道不是“强大”的美国被打得屁股尿流的逃回美国的吗？

sun814

Notsing 发表于 11-7-2011 23:31
我已经够近了，随时可以驾车到美国，我还是重复我早问你的那一句：How come you haven't dumped your sin ...

难怪你能说这么多大话，原来你已经“逃到”靠近美国的国家了，事不关自，说话站着不腰疼。哈哈如果中国愿意给我中国护照，我是愿意的，可我想中国的人才这么多，不需要我的。不过美国一定很喜欢你这样只会说“yes man”的香蕉人（内白外黄）。是的，美国是受到国内的压力而撤离越南，弃下民主的南越，难道不是因为美军在越南死伤惨重，而造成国民强烈的反对吗？其他的例子还有索马里。

WenJiaXin

Notsing 发表于 12-7-2011 00:20
Nice to see you're a chickenshit racist too, supporters of oppressive regimes usually are anyway,  ...

你的观点类似于美国的反华政客。从另一面可以看得出以美国为首的西方国家都是以民主为根基，这也许值得中国政府的借鉴。但是，我们不难发现出矛盾的根本原因是社会主义与资本主义根本分歧。所以，当你已资本主义的角度去评价社会主义时，看法会产生偏差。同样，以崇尚社会主义的中国代表来评价西方资本主义体制时也会有同样的想法。记得小时候修读中国政治。大多的教科书都说西方国家是赤裸裸的金钱与剥削关系，这样的例子比比皆是，例如（南京条约），（北京条约），（马关条约）和（辛丑条约）都可以鲜明的反映出西方“人人平等”是显得那么苍弱无力。虽然被灌输社会主义理论也许会造成教育人士对西方看法的偏差，但是我觉得其有可用之处。

对于你所说的中国军力评价，我觉得比较主观因为解放军军力是个谜，这也导致美国，日本的恐惧，他们联合要求北京应该公布军事报告。

至于你提到的西藏和新疆[关键词屏蔽]，与其说不民主，不如看成是中国在社会主义初级阶段的发展中曲折前进。这些[关键词屏蔽]并非一无是处，它们会时时刻刻给中国执政者敲响警钟。

有这种看法并不代表中国人喜欢共产党，社会主义制度只能允许[关键词屏蔽]，因为毛主席击败了蒋介石我们必须接受共产党的领导方针。贪WU腐败在中国是一项长远而艰巨的任务。随着时间的此消彼长，南海问题，钓鱼岛事件，还有国内的[关键词屏蔽]都可以解决。因为战争带给人们的经历是惨痛的，所以中国一直以来坚持独立自主，和平共处的外交方针，这是周恩来总理在印尼的万隆会议提出的。

总之，你以西方民族主义来看待评判中国无可厚非，但是如果你深入了解中国历史文化知识，你的看法会面面俱到，一语中的。